Students’ Difficulties in Mastering Structure and Written Expression Of Paper-Based TOEFL

Muhajir Muhajir

Abstract


Obtaining a score of TOEFL higher than 500 has been proven difficult. Some studies showed that students had biggest problems in answering section two of PBT TOEFL. Therefore, this study was aimed at investigating difficulties encountered by advanced EFL learners in mastering structure and written expression tested in PBT TOEFL. The PBT TOEFL test, designed by ETS, was conducted to 25 advanced undergraduate students, selected by using a convenient sampling technique, at Syiah Kuala University. The test consisted of 40 multiple choice questions and the students completed it within 25 minutes. The result revealed that the students faced a serious problems with redundancy (48%), followed by verb form (53%), pronoun error (55%), plural (55%), WIAS (57%), parallelism (59%), article (60%), word order (61%), conjunction (62%), deleted word (71%), prepositional phrase (71%), word choice (73%), and part of speech (74%). It was concluded that redundancy was the most difficult aspect for the students. Hence, it is suggested that university lectures who teach structure pay more attention to this aspect.

Keywords


TOEFL; Structure and Written Expression; Redundancy; Verb Form

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ananda, R. (2016). Problems with section two ITP TOEFL test. Studies in English Language and Education, 3(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.17969/siele.v3i1.3387

ETS. (2000). TOEFL preparation kit (Vol. 1). New Jersey: Educational Testing Service.

ETS. (2004). Test and score data summary. Princeton, New Jersey.

ETS. (2006). Test and score data summary for TOEFL computer-based and paper-based tests. Princeton, New Jersey.

Freedle, R., & Kostin, I. (1996). The prediction of TOEFL listening comprehension item difficulty for minitalk passages: implications for construct validity. New Jersey.

Gallagher, N. (2000). Delta’s key to the TOEFL test. Miller Parkway: Delta Publishing Company.

Gear, J., & Gear, R. (2002). Cambridge preparation for the TOEFL test. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of english language teaching (3th ed.). New York: Longman group limited.

Hilke, R., & Wadden, P. (1997). The TOEFL and its imitators: analyzing the TOEFL and evaluating TOEFL-prep texts. RELC, 28(1), 28–53.

Mahlill. (2010). A study of students’ difficulties in listening section of the TOEFL test. Syiah Kuala Univerisity.

Phillips, D. (2001). Longman complete course for the TOEFL test. New York: Addison-Wesley Longman.

Putra, T. M., Kasim, U., & Mustafa, F. (2017). Reading comprehension in the PBT TOEFL : Which sub-skills deserve more intensive training? In International Conference on the Teaching and Learning of Languages, At Sarawak (pp. 772–748). Sarawak: International Conference on The Teaching & Learning of Languages.

Pyle, M. A. (1995). Cliffs TOEFL preparation guide. New Delhi: Wiley India Pvt. Limited.

Rainy, Ikhsanudin, & Sumarni. (2014). Analyzing students’ TOEFL listening comprehension test performance. Journal Untan, 3(10), 2–12.

Rogers, B. (2011). The complete guide to the TOEFL test. Massachusetts: Sherrise Roehr.

Sharpe. (2004). How to prepare for the TOEFL test (11th ed.). New York: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc.

Sharpe, P. (2012). TOEFL IBT internet-based test (13th ed.). New York: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc.

Swan, M. (2005). Practical english usage (3th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Unsyiah. (2016). Panduan akademik program diploma, sarjana, profesi magister/spesialis, dan doktor/subspesialis. Banda Aceh: Universitas Syiah Kuala.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Research in English and Education Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2018 Syiah Kuala University

e-ISSN: 2528-746X

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.