The Use of Metacognitive Reading Strategies by EFL Learners in Reading

Tika Suharni


Reading is considered as one of the most important skills in learning English as a foreign Language. Furthermore, it is important for the students to comprehend the text that they read and aware of the strategies they use in the reading process. Nevertheless, the students may have to deal with the problems when they read in English especially an academic text. In this case, it is necessary to find out about the students’ awareness and discover the use of reading strategies in reading process. This study aimed to reveal the students metacognitive awareness and the metacognitive reading strategies that are frequently used. In this study, quantitative research method was used through the implementation of Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS) questionnaire by Mokhtari and Reichard (2002).  The questionnaires were distributed to thirty students of a Critical Reading Class in Study Program of English Education, Syiah Kuala University. The results indicated that the students have high awareness of metacognitive reading strategies and use Problem Solving Reading Strategies (PROB) with high frequency.


Metacognitive awareness; reading strategies; reading comprehension

Full Text:



Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Cognitive Monitoring in Reading. Understanding Reading Comprehension, 12 (2), 21–44.

Barnet, M. A. (1988). Reading through Context: How Real and Perceived Strategy Use Affects L2 Comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 73(2), 150–162.

Carel, P., Pharis, B. ., & Liberto, J. (1989). Metacognitive Strategy Training for ESL Reading. TESOL Quarterly, 23(4), 647–678.

Carrel, P. J. D.(1988). Interactive Approach to Second Language Reading. Cambridge: Press Syndicate.

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. New York: Newbury House Publisher.

Dundar, S. (2016). Determining EFL Students’ Awareness of Metacognitive Reading Strategies. ELT Research Journal, 5(1), 47–59.

Fitrisia, D., Tan, K-E.,& Yusuf, Y.Q. (2015). Investigating Metacognitive Awareness Of Reading Strategies To Strengthen Students' Performance In Reading Comprehension. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 30 (1), 15–30.

Karbalaei, A. (2010). A comparison of the metacognitive reading strategies used by EFL and ESL readers. The Reading Matrix, 10(2), 165–180.

Khalsiah & Fata,I.A. (2016). Learning literacy in the classroom through art and student character. Proceeding of The 1st EEIC in conjunction with The 2nd Reciprocal Graduate Research Symposium-CAPEU (pp 539-541), Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh.

Klingner, J. K. (2007). Teaching Reading Comprehension to Students with Learning Difficulties. New York: The Guildford Press.

Martinez, A. C. L. (2008). Analysis of ESP University Students’ Reading Strategy Awareness. IBERICA, 15,(1) 165–176.

Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. (2002). Assessing Students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249–259.

Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. New York: Newbury House Publisher.

Pereira-Laird, J. A., & Deane, F. P. (1997). Development and Validation of A Self-Report Measure of Reading Strategy Use. Reading Psychology, 18 (2),185–235.

Tankersley, K. (2003). The Threads of Reading: Strategy for Literacy Development. New York: Newbury House Publisher.

Tavakoli, H. (2014). The effectiveness of metacognitive strategy awareness in reading comprehension: The case of Iranian university EFL students. Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 14(2), 314–336.

Wang, J., Spencer, K., & Xing, M. (2009). Metacognitive beliefs and strategies in learning Chinese as a foreign language. System, 37(1), 46–56.

Westwood, P. (2001). Reading and Learning Difficulties: Approaches to Teaching and Assessment. Camberwell, Victoria: ACER.

Zhang, L. J. (2009). Chinese senior high school EFL students ’ metacognitive awareness and reading-strategy use. Reading, 21(1), 37–59.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 Research in English and Education Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 Syiah Kuala University

e-ISSN: 2528-746X

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.